I know, I know, Mardi Gras was over a week ago. I was so drunk and hungover that I couldn't even get the post written! Okay, that's not true. Really I forgot that I was even going to write it. Not because MG wasn't fun, but because I'm a forgetful space case sometimes.
Anyway. Remember way back when I went on a tour of the Laurel Apartments, MX redevelopment, etc.? The apartments have been open for occupancy for some time, but they had their official grand opening celebration last Tuesday night. It was warm for February, so they had food in the open-air courtyard of the apartments, as well as some inside. I think there were three or four different spots you could find food and drink. And one of their most ingenious ideas was hot chocolate in paper cups that we could take downstairs to watch the parade!
I didn't go to the big Saturday parade, but I know the Tuesday night one is much smaller. Still, it's nice that they do it.
After that, we went to A&N's house and had ribs and cole slaw from Bogart's Smokehouse! Bogart's in the new(ish) restaurant opened by the same guys who own Pappy's. I've never actually been to the establishment, but now at least I can say I've had their food (and it was great)!
Wednesday, February 29, 2012
Tuesday, February 28, 2012
Bailey's Range
I went to Bailey's Range last night with a group of friends for dinner. I'd heard mixed things about it, but it's hard to go too wrong when you're serving burgers and alcoholic milkshakes, so I figured I'd give it a shot.
I got the Blackened Bleu burger, which was good but not the best bleu cheese burger I've ever had. Bonus points though for the enormous chunks of cheese! They weren't skimping. But beware when you order your burger: fries (or any other side) are not included. I ordered a side of fries, and they were delightful - a little crispy, almost salty enough, and I had my pick of about a dozen sauces. I went with the chipotle catsup (or as I would say, ketchup).
The real winner was a creation all my own though. Going back to my days of living in London, I have a major obsession with Bailey's ice cream. Haagen Dazs for a while put out a Bailey's ice cream, and it was amazing. I found it I think twice as a "special edition" as I got back to Chicago, but no more. (They do still have it in England - or at least they did the last time I was there, in 2009.)
So there we were at the restaurant last night, and since it's Bailey's Range, they have Bailey's ice cream! I didn't yet know what kind of burger or catsup/ketchup I wanted, but I knew I would have Bailey's ice cream. I started with the idea of their Irish Coffee - Jameson, Bailey's, and espresso ice cream - and I modified it to suit my needs: Bailey's, Bailey's ice cream, and espresso ice cream. It was like being back in London! Definitely worth the price of admission.
Although I didn't try either of the burgers, a fun thing on the menu is their burger showdown: two burgers, and whichever gets ordered more frequently sticks around to fight another week. If I lived near there, I'd be a regular for that culinary experimentation.
And, after my oh-so-tasty boozy milkshake, the second best thing about Bailey's Range is that they're doing what this city most needs - which is to say, it's making it feel like a city. They're located at 10th and Olive downtown (and they identify as such on their website, not with their actual street address), so not on Washington Avenue. It's a two-story establishment, because that's often what you have to do when you're not in the suburbs. And the way to get upstairs is this narrow little marble staircase that's probably 100 years old. It's inconvenient and a challenge if you're wearing heels and probably a huge liability and it has character. Amen, brother.
I got the Blackened Bleu burger, which was good but not the best bleu cheese burger I've ever had. Bonus points though for the enormous chunks of cheese! They weren't skimping. But beware when you order your burger: fries (or any other side) are not included. I ordered a side of fries, and they were delightful - a little crispy, almost salty enough, and I had my pick of about a dozen sauces. I went with the chipotle catsup (or as I would say, ketchup).
The real winner was a creation all my own though. Going back to my days of living in London, I have a major obsession with Bailey's ice cream. Haagen Dazs for a while put out a Bailey's ice cream, and it was amazing. I found it I think twice as a "special edition" as I got back to Chicago, but no more. (They do still have it in England - or at least they did the last time I was there, in 2009.)
So there we were at the restaurant last night, and since it's Bailey's Range, they have Bailey's ice cream! I didn't yet know what kind of burger or catsup/ketchup I wanted, but I knew I would have Bailey's ice cream. I started with the idea of their Irish Coffee - Jameson, Bailey's, and espresso ice cream - and I modified it to suit my needs: Bailey's, Bailey's ice cream, and espresso ice cream. It was like being back in London! Definitely worth the price of admission.
Although I didn't try either of the burgers, a fun thing on the menu is their burger showdown: two burgers, and whichever gets ordered more frequently sticks around to fight another week. If I lived near there, I'd be a regular for that culinary experimentation.
And, after my oh-so-tasty boozy milkshake, the second best thing about Bailey's Range is that they're doing what this city most needs - which is to say, it's making it feel like a city. They're located at 10th and Olive downtown (and they identify as such on their website, not with their actual street address), so not on Washington Avenue. It's a two-story establishment, because that's often what you have to do when you're not in the suburbs. And the way to get upstairs is this narrow little marble staircase that's probably 100 years old. It's inconvenient and a challenge if you're wearing heels and probably a huge liability and it has character. Amen, brother.
Sunday, February 26, 2012
Goal #9
Goal #9: clear out my e-mail inboxes.
They've gotten a little bit out of control. Every now and then I go through my inboxes and delete or archive old messages as appropriate, but it's been a while since that happened. Unfortunately, the purging process takes a long time, because it involves writing and reading lots of long e-mails.
So the truth is, I probably won't get through all of my e-mails, because I have lots of e-mail addresses. But I'm going to do my best to get through the three that I actually use with some regularity. Maybe you will get an overdue e-mail from me!
Recap of Goal #8: I'll give myself a D on this one. When I thought about the journal, I had no problem coming up with things to be thankful for. But the problem was actually thinking about it. I've never been a good, regular journal keeper, and this was no different. There were three days I completely forgot that I was even supposed to be doing anything, although on one of those days I just passed out completely. Not only did I not
They've gotten a little bit out of control. Every now and then I go through my inboxes and delete or archive old messages as appropriate, but it's been a while since that happened. Unfortunately, the purging process takes a long time, because it involves writing and reading lots of long e-mails.
So the truth is, I probably won't get through all of my e-mails, because I have lots of e-mail addresses. But I'm going to do my best to get through the three that I actually use with some regularity. Maybe you will get an overdue e-mail from me!
Recap of Goal #8: I'll give myself a D on this one. When I thought about the journal, I had no problem coming up with things to be thankful for. But the problem was actually thinking about it. I've never been a good, regular journal keeper, and this was no different. There were three days I completely forgot that I was even supposed to be doing anything, although on one of those days I just passed out completely. Not only did I not
Friday, February 24, 2012
Random Links
Unfortunately the sidebar where I post all my random and/or fun and/or bizarre links has been broken for quite some time. I have been amassing links but have been unable to post! So now, for your entertainment and edification, here they are:
I don't know why it's so fun to watch this dog tearing up the ground, but it is.
Where not to go.
Amazing animals.
Mushrooms vs. funeral.
Puppy rescue.
Cabin porn.
Where should you have gone to high school?
Seriously Google? Just stop it.
The most beautiful bookstores.
Neil and Jason: the Confrontation Song.
Don't tease the frog.
I don't know why it's so fun to watch this dog tearing up the ground, but it is.
Where not to go.
Amazing animals.
Mushrooms vs. funeral.
Puppy rescue.
Cabin porn.
Where should you have gone to high school?
Seriously Google? Just stop it.
The most beautiful bookstores.
Neil and Jason: the Confrontation Song.
Don't tease the frog.
Thursday, February 23, 2012
What I'm Reading Now -- Outliers
Wednesday, February 22, 2012
The Invention of Air -- Take 2
The version of The Invention of Air that I listened to must have been abridged - it was a long time ago that I imported it to iTunes. But it was short, and I'm writing that off as abridgement.
What might also be the fault of abridgement is my big complaint: the narrative almost completely lacked flow until about halfway through. I really like this period in history, and even I had a hard time following the story and staying interested. I can only imagine how dry it must seem to someone who isn't so taken with the revolutionaries. This may or may not be a fault of the author; it might be bad writing (and editing), or it might just be poor abridgement. Either way, it was frustrating.
Eventually, the story does pick up and start to move in a linear and understandable fashion, and from that point on it was enjoyable.
The author also makes some obvious but refreshing observations about the time in general. I love looking back on the revolutionary period, because all the main players were such Renaissance men - interested (and capable! and successful!) in fields of science, politics, literature, even agriculture. Because such huge advances were being made in technology at the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, new areas of study were accessible to anyone with the funds to get involved. New fields were ripe for discovery, innovation, and development in a way that they no longer are. Then, a man such as Joseph Priestley who was willing to commit himself to some serious study could make numerous significant discoveries in multiple fields. Now, to make a groundbreaking discovery in chemistry or physics, you have to dedicate your life to it, and even then the chances of making such a discovery are slim. It was a more elemental time, full of possibilities in a whole different way than what we know now.
So, all in all, I'd say the second half was enjoyable, and for the most part could have been appreciated without the first part.
What might also be the fault of abridgement is my big complaint: the narrative almost completely lacked flow until about halfway through. I really like this period in history, and even I had a hard time following the story and staying interested. I can only imagine how dry it must seem to someone who isn't so taken with the revolutionaries. This may or may not be a fault of the author; it might be bad writing (and editing), or it might just be poor abridgement. Either way, it was frustrating.
Eventually, the story does pick up and start to move in a linear and understandable fashion, and from that point on it was enjoyable.
The author also makes some obvious but refreshing observations about the time in general. I love looking back on the revolutionary period, because all the main players were such Renaissance men - interested (and capable! and successful!) in fields of science, politics, literature, even agriculture. Because such huge advances were being made in technology at the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, new areas of study were accessible to anyone with the funds to get involved. New fields were ripe for discovery, innovation, and development in a way that they no longer are. Then, a man such as Joseph Priestley who was willing to commit himself to some serious study could make numerous significant discoveries in multiple fields. Now, to make a groundbreaking discovery in chemistry or physics, you have to dedicate your life to it, and even then the chances of making such a discovery are slim. It was a more elemental time, full of possibilities in a whole different way than what we know now.
So, all in all, I'd say the second half was enjoyable, and for the most part could have been appreciated without the first part.
Tuesday, February 21, 2012
What I Watched -- The Company Men

Somehow, The Company Men is one of those movies that sort of flew under my radar. I had heard of it, but only in passing, and I don't think I read any reviews or the like. And I'm not sure how all that happened, because it has quite and impressive cast, and usually such movies are all over the place. Maybe the reason was because, while all of the performances were good, none of them were Oscar-worthy. Just generally a good ensemble.
Said cast members include Ben Affleck, Chris Cooper, and Tommy Lee Jones as the poor guys who lose their jobs. Ben Affleck has done his share of terrible movies (Gigli, Phantoms, Daddy and Them - full disclosure: I did not see any of these movies, but I'm assuming they're bad), but also some darn good ones (The Town, Dogma, and of course Good Will Hunting). Chris Cooper has been on quite a run in the last several years, with hits including The Bourne Identity and Supremacy, Seabiscuit, Capote, Syriana, and (also) The Town. And then there's Tommy Lee Jones. Holy hell, he's a good actor. The Fugitive, JFK, In the Valley of Elah, No Country for Old Men... Need I go on? In his review of Elah, Roger Ebert ponders why TLJ is so good: "Look at the lines around his eyes. He looks concerned, under pressure from himself, a man who has felt pain. Look at his face. It seems to conceal hurtful emotion. He doesn't smile a lot, but when he does, it's like the clouds are lifting. Listen to his voice, filled with authority and hard experience. Notice when he speaks that he passes words out as if they were money he can't afford."
And those are just the three mains! There's also Kevin Costner, who I think is actually my favorite character in the movie. So, here's the setup. The three above play Bobby, Phil, and Gene, respectively (and from lowest to highest in order of seniority). All three lose their jobs. Bobby's wife Maggie (the lovely Rosemarie DeWitt) comes from a working class family, and her brother Jack (Costner), who's just the right mix of asshole and good guy, offers Bobby some carpentry work to help him through. Also stars Craig T "Coach" Nelson as the bossman and Maria Bello (another lovely) as the not-quite-universally hated HR employee tasked with handling the firings.
I like that these three guys - Gene most obviously, but each in his own way - is a contradiction. Gene is totally on the straight and narrow at work, wants to do the ethical thing, the right thing, even if it isn't best for the company. But - MINOR SPOILER ALERT - he's cheating on his wife. Bobby has the best, most stable home life, but is obsessed with outward appearances. Phil is the tough guy who may be the most soft-hearted.
Bottom line: some of this movie is roses and unicorns, some is not. I like that. I didn't know what to expect when I started watching it, and I like that too. But what I liked most of all was that I was pleasantly surprised.
Monday, February 20, 2012
What I Watched -- Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy
It turned out that my big V-day date with T was go to see the new version of Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy, because I can't think of anything more romantic than Cold War espionage.
This movie takes some work to watch. You really have to pay attention to every detail, but it's worth the trouble.
Gary Oldman is sublimely reserved as the disgraced George Smiley. There will be the inevitable comparisons to Alec Guinness, who starred in the BBC miniseries on which this movie is based. While I have seen the miniseries - five hours of spy-tacular goodness - it was a long time ago and I don't remember the details well enough to share my thoughts with you. (The miniseries, in turn, was based on John le Carre's book of the same name, which is itself part of the Karla Trilogy, also including The Honourable Schoolboy and Smiley's People. Call for the Dead, The Spy Who Came in From the Cold, and other le Carre books also star Mr. Smiley, in case you want further reading, but not part of the trilogy.)
But anyway, the story. George Smiley is a lifelong spy who was unceremoniously run out of "the Circus" by the newer, younger guys. Something wasn't right about that, and the reappearance of one of their men who had gone AWOL turns up information that one of the men at the Circus is a mole, a double agent working for the Soviets. But is the information true? If so, who is it? How does this all fit with that Smiley knows from his time there? Watch, and you'll find out.
Also stars John Hurt, Colin Firth, Ciaran Hinds, Toby Jones (who you don't know you know, but you do if you're a Harry Potter fan), and the man with the best name of all, Benedict Cumberbatch.
Bottom line: a classic spy movie. While there is some blood and guts, don't go in expecting Bourne-style action. But if you can do that, you won't be disappointed.
This movie takes some work to watch. You really have to pay attention to every detail, but it's worth the trouble.
Gary Oldman is sublimely reserved as the disgraced George Smiley. There will be the inevitable comparisons to Alec Guinness, who starred in the BBC miniseries on which this movie is based. While I have seen the miniseries - five hours of spy-tacular goodness - it was a long time ago and I don't remember the details well enough to share my thoughts with you. (The miniseries, in turn, was based on John le Carre's book of the same name, which is itself part of the Karla Trilogy, also including The Honourable Schoolboy and Smiley's People. Call for the Dead, The Spy Who Came in From the Cold, and other le Carre books also star Mr. Smiley, in case you want further reading, but not part of the trilogy.)
But anyway, the story. George Smiley is a lifelong spy who was unceremoniously run out of "the Circus" by the newer, younger guys. Something wasn't right about that, and the reappearance of one of their men who had gone AWOL turns up information that one of the men at the Circus is a mole, a double agent working for the Soviets. But is the information true? If so, who is it? How does this all fit with that Smiley knows from his time there? Watch, and you'll find out.
Also stars John Hurt, Colin Firth, Ciaran Hinds, Toby Jones (who you don't know you know, but you do if you're a Harry Potter fan), and the man with the best name of all, Benedict Cumberbatch.
Bottom line: a classic spy movie. While there is some blood and guts, don't go in expecting Bourne-style action. But if you can do that, you won't be disappointed.
Sunday, February 19, 2012
Goal #8
Goal #8: keep a daily gratitude journal.
Why not? There are so many good things. Might as well try to appreciate them.
Recap of Goal #7: guys, I have to be honest: I didn't do it.
You might ask, "How could you mess up a goal as simple and delightful as having a glass of red wine a day?" Beer. That's the answer. All was going well until Friday, when I went out to meet some folks at a bar. Unfortunately, the wine choices ranged from limited to nonexistent, so I opted for Blue Moon instead. And by the time I got home, I was so tired all I could do was collapse into bed.
Funny...you'd think Friday night would be the night I'd most need a glass of wine, wouldn't you?
Why not? There are so many good things. Might as well try to appreciate them.
Recap of Goal #7: guys, I have to be honest: I didn't do it.
You might ask, "How could you mess up a goal as simple and delightful as having a glass of red wine a day?" Beer. That's the answer. All was going well until Friday, when I went out to meet some folks at a bar. Unfortunately, the wine choices ranged from limited to nonexistent, so I opted for Blue Moon instead. And by the time I got home, I was so tired all I could do was collapse into bed.
Funny...you'd think Friday night would be the night I'd most need a glass of wine, wouldn't you?
Saturday, February 18, 2012
What I Watched -- Win Win
It took me two tries to get through Win Win, but not because the movie wasn't good. I just pulled my usual movie routine of falling asleep in the first 20 minutes. It's pretty standard for me and has nothing to do with the quality of the movie.
Paul Giamatti again plays kind of a hapless character with a good heart (see Sideways). (Although don't write him off as completely typecast. If you saw John Adams, you know that he can accomplish great things when he's trading letters with one Laura Linney.)
In this particular movie, Giamatti plays an attorney and wrestling coach struggling to make ends meet and hide that fact from his wife Jackie (Amy Ryan). Into their lives falls Kyle (played by Alex Shaffer in his first role), a runaway who just happens to be a fantastic wrestler. (Shaffer is actually a state champ wrestler in real life.)
Though he's a bit unorthodox and unpredictable, Kyle turns around the wrestling team and forces some honesty between Mike and Jackie. Also includes Jeffrey Tambor, Bobby Cannavale (whom director Tom McCarthy also cast in The Station Agent), and Melanie Lynskey in the cast of lost souls.
Bottom line: all the casting was good and Giamatti was appropriately funny, but Alex Shaffer really stole the show as Kyle. He was just believable enough to seem real, but not so much so that he was boring. It's a good, if somewhat predictable, feel-good film.
Paul Giamatti again plays kind of a hapless character with a good heart (see Sideways). (Although don't write him off as completely typecast. If you saw John Adams, you know that he can accomplish great things when he's trading letters with one Laura Linney.)
In this particular movie, Giamatti plays an attorney and wrestling coach struggling to make ends meet and hide that fact from his wife Jackie (Amy Ryan). Into their lives falls Kyle (played by Alex Shaffer in his first role), a runaway who just happens to be a fantastic wrestler. (Shaffer is actually a state champ wrestler in real life.)
Though he's a bit unorthodox and unpredictable, Kyle turns around the wrestling team and forces some honesty between Mike and Jackie. Also includes Jeffrey Tambor, Bobby Cannavale (whom director Tom McCarthy also cast in The Station Agent), and Melanie Lynskey in the cast of lost souls.
Bottom line: all the casting was good and Giamatti was appropriately funny, but Alex Shaffer really stole the show as Kyle. He was just believable enough to seem real, but not so much so that he was boring. It's a good, if somewhat predictable, feel-good film.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



