![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEglk7q1QG6nYHw-lLnC9Tazl1S9YC5WLmlAfPPRCBQxf9XRGPp701mCVWn0yRctGZAoVoId1hL5VLhqHanccE4zx0v_I5gOzeOUddhrfE-wVQ564XefVMMnimH3YJiSYjV52zqDAsHHR0T9/s320/savages.jpg)
The whole movie feels a little bit off-kilter. A lot of the shots look more like something that a still photographer would use, rather than a cinematographer. A lot of faces are cut off, or the angle is strange, but it kind of works with this movie. You get the idea that the Wendy and Jon are both a little off in their lives, unsure of what they're doing, where they're going, etc. Then you throw in the complications of having to take care of a father who never really took care of them and navigating the complicated world of elder care. No wonder they feel off-balance. But eventually I stopped noticing that the angles were funny or faces were cut off because the shots work so well to support the story!
This seems to me to be a timely movie. I suspect more and more people are going through a situation similar to Wendy and Jon's, as the average age of our population creeps higher. Maybe we can learn something from their trials and tribulations: if nothing else, siblings have to stick together.
I approve of this post in a big way :)
ReplyDelete