![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj3RqumMR48blnSsCa98YAwTi5U8KYGuVycOq4-FoiqLDb0ytQ35G_8LLiEg8rFp6F3FeXJYv4pX5mnSzMTkoMm9lJF8YVCqr2U_6FWNj9Wx4Y05WxY-yPrz7ywo5Mk_b_jwfiW3q3hhDMm/s320/hugo.jpg)
Hugo, the movie version of the book, was another one of the (many) movies I didn't manage to see before the Oscars this year, even though I wanted to. So here I am, six months later, finally getting around to it. (It was 105 degress in St. Louis on the day I watched this movie. A little snow in Paris never looked so lovely.)
On to the actual movie. It is every but the ode to the magic of movie-making that critics accused it of being. But if you can put that aside, it's a fun story. Hugo is an orphan living in a Paris train station, and it's his job to keep the clocks running. At night he is working hard to find a hidden message from his deceased father. He befriends Isabelle (Chloe Grace Moretz, whom I have loved in all two of the things I have seen her in) and together the two of them get into trouble. Typical stuff, but charming.
I do have one major complaint though: why does a movie set in Paris, where the characters have French names (Hugo Cabret, Isabelle with two l's and an e, Georges Melies, Lisette), use British accents? The Eiffel Tower is a major visual set piece, people! I know geography lessons have fallen by the wayside in schools, but, really?
Bottom line: predictably bow-tied, but sweet.
I had been wanting to see this before the Oscars too, and just loved it when I finally got a round tuit. Watched and re-watched. I love kid movies!
ReplyDelete